Testing · Real estate

Radon Testing During Real Estate Transactions

Real estate testing is different. The result has to be defensible. Here's the SB23-206 disclosure rules, the CRM standard, who can place a test, and how the Colorado inspection objection works.

Testing during a Colorado real estate transaction follows different rules than testing your own home. The result has to be defensible to a buyer's lender, the seller, and potentially an attorney. The method matters more, the tester's credentials matter more, and Colorado has a specific disclosure law that controls what the seller has to share.

This page walks through SB23-206 (Colorado's mandatory radon disclosure law), the test methodology that's standard for real estate, who can place a test, how the inspection objection process works, and what happens when the result comes back high.

Colorado SB23-206 — the disclosure law

Effective August 7, 2023, Colorado law (SB23-206, codified at CRS § 38-35.7-112) requires sellers of residential property to provide buyers with:[1]

  • Any known prior radon test results for the property.
  • Documentation of any radon mitigation work that has been performed.
  • The CDPHE radon brochure.

The law applies to both sales and residential leases. It does not require sellers to test or mitigate — only to disclose what they already know. The disclosure is delivered through the Seller's Property Disclosure form (revised by the Colorado Real Estate Commission post-SB23-206).[2]

What this means in practice:

  • If the seller had a prior test, you should see the result in the SPD form before you go under contract.
  • If the seller had mitigation done, you should have the system documentation and post-mitigation test result.
  • If you discover elevated radon during inspection that wasn't disclosed, and the seller knew about a prior test, that's a fact pattern worth showing your real estate attorney.
  • If you mitigate after closing, the system becomes your required disclosure when you eventually sell.

The test method real estate uses

Real-estate testing almost always uses a professional continuous radon monitor (CRM) placed by a DORA-licensed, NRPP or NRSB certified tester.[3] The reasons:

  • Defensibility. The result must hold up if the seller, buyer, or lender disputes it. CRMs record hourly readings, time-stamp the data, and produce a written report on lab letterhead.
  • Anti-tampering. CRMs detect closed-house violations and movement. If a window is opened during the test or the monitor is moved, the hourly data shows it.
  • Speed. CRMs typically run for 48 hours and produce results in 48–72 hours total. That fits a standard Colorado inspection objection window.
  • Standard professional practice. The Colorado Association of Realtors and Pikes Peak Association of Realtors treat CRM results as the standard.

Cost: $150–$300 in Colorado Springs. Usually paid by the buyer as part of inspection costs, though it can be negotiated.

Who can place a real estate test in Colorado

Colorado is one of the few states with state-level radon professional licensing. To place a real-estate-grade radon test in Colorado, the tester must:

  • Hold a current DORA radon measurement license (Office of Radon Professionals, 4 CCR 754-1).[3]
  • Hold a current NRPP or NRSB measurement certification.[4]
  • Use an EPA-listed or AARST-certified continuous radon monitor.
  • Follow AARST measurement standards (MAH or MS-MAH for residential).

Many Colorado home inspectors are also licensed radon testers — the credentials stack. If your inspector isn't a licensed tester, they should refer to one. Don't accept a real estate radon test from anyone who can't provide both DORA and NRPP/NRSB credentials.

The inspection objection workflow

A typical Colorado real estate timeline for radon:

DayWhat happens
0Offer accepted, contract signed
1–3Inspection scheduled; radon test placed during inspection
3–5Test retrieved (48-hour CRM)
5–7Test result returned
By inspection objection deadline (typically 5–10 days after contract)Buyer submits inspection objection if result is above 4.0 pCi/L
3 days after objectionSeller's response deadline (typical)
By inspection resolution deadlineBuyer and seller agree on resolution or buyer terminates
Closing dayMitigation complete OR credit applied OR contract terminated

The buyer's options under the inspection objection are covered on the real-estate-deadlines cost page.

What if the seller already mitigated?

If the seller's disclosure shows a prior mitigation system, the buyer should verify a few things before relying on it:

  • Post-mitigation test result. What was the system's verified outcome? It should be below 4.0 pCi/L.
  • System age. Fans typically last 5+ years. A 10-year-old fan may be nearing replacement.
  • Manometer condition. Look at the system. The manometer columns should be at different levels (system pulling vacuum). If they're equal, the fan isn't running.
  • System documentation. The seller should have the contractor's invoice, system certification, DORA license info, and post-mit test result.
  • Re-test the home. Run a current short-term test during the inspection period to confirm the existing system is still bringing levels below 4.0 pCi/L.

What if the seller's disclosure says "no known test"?

Most Colorado sellers honestly haven't tested. In that case the disclosure says "no known test result." The buyer's typical move:

  1. Include a radon test in the inspection (most Colorado home inspectors offer this as an add-on).
  2. If the result is above 4.0 pCi/L, file an inspection objection and proceed through the buyer-options process.
  3. If the result is below 4.0 pCi/L but above 2.0, decide whether to ask for a credit anyway (some buyers do; this is a negotiation issue, not a legal one).
  4. If the result is below 2.0 pCi/L, the home is fine for now. Plan to retest every 2 years after closing.

Tampering and validity controls

CRMs include tamper detection because real estate testing has a long history of attempts (usually by sellers) to bias the result. Common signs the tester will flag:

  • Hourly data shows a sudden drop coinciding with window operation.
  • Sustained spikes that look like the test was moved closer to a soil-gas source.
  • Temperature or humidity changes inconsistent with normal home conditions.
  • Motion-detected disturbance of the monitor.

A flagged test should be re-run. The cost of the second test is typically the seller's if tampering is documented; it's the buyer's otherwise.

Common scenario — under contract, no prior disclosure, inspection result 6.5 pCi/L

A buyer under contract on a 1990s tri-level in Stetson Hills. The seller's SPD form said "no known prior test." The buyer's inspector also placed a 48-hour CRM during the inspection. Result: 6.5 pCi/L. With 5 days remaining on the inspection objection deadline, the buyer filed an objection requesting a $3,000 seller credit at closing (anchored on the four-scenario framework — tri-level means multi-zone, $2,200–$4,800 band). The seller agreed. After closing, the buyer hired a DORA-licensed contractor, who ran a PFE diagnostic and installed a two-suction-point system for $2,650. Post-mitigation test came in at 1.8 pCi/L. The buyer's documentation now lives in the home folder; when they sell, it becomes part of their SB23-206 disclosure.

Get a Colorado Radon Quote

Tell us about your home and test result and we'll connect you with a licensed Colorado mitigation partner who serves your area. No high-pressure sales calls, no contracts to start.

Request a Quote