Testing during a Colorado real estate transaction follows different rules than testing your own home. The result has to be defensible to a buyer's lender, the seller, and potentially an attorney. The method matters more, the tester's credentials matter more, and Colorado has a specific disclosure law that controls what the seller has to share.
This page walks through SB23-206 (Colorado's mandatory radon disclosure law), the test methodology that's standard for real estate, who can place a test, how the inspection objection process works, and what happens when the result comes back high.
Colorado SB23-206 — the disclosure law
Effective August 7, 2023, Colorado law (SB23-206, codified at CRS § 38-35.7-112) requires sellers of residential property to provide buyers with:[1]
- Any known prior radon test results for the property.
- Documentation of any radon mitigation work that has been performed.
- The CDPHE radon brochure.
The law applies to both sales and residential leases. It does not require sellers to test or mitigate — only to disclose what they already know. The disclosure is delivered through the Seller's Property Disclosure form (revised by the Colorado Real Estate Commission post-SB23-206).[2]
What this means in practice:
- If the seller had a prior test, you should see the result in the SPD form before you go under contract.
- If the seller had mitigation done, you should have the system documentation and post-mitigation test result.
- If you discover elevated radon during inspection that wasn't disclosed, and the seller knew about a prior test, that's a fact pattern worth showing your real estate attorney.
- If you mitigate after closing, the system becomes your required disclosure when you eventually sell.
The test method real estate uses
Real-estate testing almost always uses a professional continuous radon monitor (CRM) placed by a DORA-licensed, NRPP or NRSB certified tester.[3] The reasons:
- Defensibility. The result must hold up if the seller, buyer, or lender disputes it. CRMs record hourly readings, time-stamp the data, and produce a written report on lab letterhead.
- Anti-tampering. CRMs detect closed-house violations and movement. If a window is opened during the test or the monitor is moved, the hourly data shows it.
- Speed. CRMs typically run for 48 hours and produce results in 48–72 hours total. That fits a standard Colorado inspection objection window.
- Standard professional practice. The Colorado Association of Realtors and Pikes Peak Association of Realtors treat CRM results as the standard.
Cost: $150–$300 in Colorado Springs. Usually paid by the buyer as part of inspection costs, though it can be negotiated.
Who can place a real estate test in Colorado
Colorado is one of the few states with state-level radon professional licensing. To place a real-estate-grade radon test in Colorado, the tester must:
- Hold a current DORA radon measurement license (Office of Radon Professionals, 4 CCR 754-1).[3]
- Hold a current NRPP or NRSB measurement certification.[4]
- Use an EPA-listed or AARST-certified continuous radon monitor.
- Follow AARST measurement standards (MAH or MS-MAH for residential).
Many Colorado home inspectors are also licensed radon testers — the credentials stack. If your inspector isn't a licensed tester, they should refer to one. Don't accept a real estate radon test from anyone who can't provide both DORA and NRPP/NRSB credentials.
The inspection objection workflow
A typical Colorado real estate timeline for radon:
| Day | What happens |
|---|---|
| 0 | Offer accepted, contract signed |
| 1–3 | Inspection scheduled; radon test placed during inspection |
| 3–5 | Test retrieved (48-hour CRM) |
| 5–7 | Test result returned |
| By inspection objection deadline (typically 5–10 days after contract) | Buyer submits inspection objection if result is above 4.0 pCi/L |
| 3 days after objection | Seller's response deadline (typical) |
| By inspection resolution deadline | Buyer and seller agree on resolution or buyer terminates |
| Closing day | Mitigation complete OR credit applied OR contract terminated |
The buyer's options under the inspection objection are covered on the real-estate-deadlines cost page.
What if the seller already mitigated?
If the seller's disclosure shows a prior mitigation system, the buyer should verify a few things before relying on it:
- Post-mitigation test result. What was the system's verified outcome? It should be below 4.0 pCi/L.
- System age. Fans typically last 5+ years. A 10-year-old fan may be nearing replacement.
- Manometer condition. Look at the system. The manometer columns should be at different levels (system pulling vacuum). If they're equal, the fan isn't running.
- System documentation. The seller should have the contractor's invoice, system certification, DORA license info, and post-mit test result.
- Re-test the home. Run a current short-term test during the inspection period to confirm the existing system is still bringing levels below 4.0 pCi/L.
What if the seller's disclosure says "no known test"?
Most Colorado sellers honestly haven't tested. In that case the disclosure says "no known test result." The buyer's typical move:
- Include a radon test in the inspection (most Colorado home inspectors offer this as an add-on).
- If the result is above 4.0 pCi/L, file an inspection objection and proceed through the buyer-options process.
- If the result is below 4.0 pCi/L but above 2.0, decide whether to ask for a credit anyway (some buyers do; this is a negotiation issue, not a legal one).
- If the result is below 2.0 pCi/L, the home is fine for now. Plan to retest every 2 years after closing.
Tampering and validity controls
CRMs include tamper detection because real estate testing has a long history of attempts (usually by sellers) to bias the result. Common signs the tester will flag:
- Hourly data shows a sudden drop coinciding with window operation.
- Sustained spikes that look like the test was moved closer to a soil-gas source.
- Temperature or humidity changes inconsistent with normal home conditions.
- Motion-detected disturbance of the monitor.
A flagged test should be re-run. The cost of the second test is typically the seller's if tampering is documented; it's the buyer's otherwise.
A buyer under contract on a 1990s tri-level in Stetson Hills. The seller's SPD form said "no known prior test." The buyer's inspector also placed a 48-hour CRM during the inspection. Result: 6.5 pCi/L. With 5 days remaining on the inspection objection deadline, the buyer filed an objection requesting a $3,000 seller credit at closing (anchored on the four-scenario framework — tri-level means multi-zone, $2,200–$4,800 band). The seller agreed. After closing, the buyer hired a DORA-licensed contractor, who ran a PFE diagnostic and installed a two-suction-point system for $2,650. Post-mitigation test came in at 1.8 pCi/L. The buyer's documentation now lives in the home folder; when they sell, it becomes part of their SB23-206 disclosure.